[FSFLA] my proposal to Mozille: InterNet, the Inter-connection of local Net-works

Quiliro quiliro en riseup.net
Mar Feb 14 19:16:59 UTC 2017


On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:20:36 -0300
willi uebelherr <willi.uebelherr at riseup.net> wrote:

> Dear Quiliro,
> 
> many thanks for your answer. And i am very happy, that we follow the 
> same goals.
> 
> Global coordinate system
> 
> I was a little bit confused in your first explanation. And now i
> understand. But why you speak about "parallel circles in latitude"?
> We use only the equator. All vertical (logitudional, in pole
> direction) ways we define with a turning circle and step on this
> up/down/around. In practical, we have only two circles. A fixed one
> and a turned one.
> 
> Its like the old high precison ship and laboratory globe. This i
> found in older documents. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz used the same.

I don't understand. You want to keep the same latitude system? I think
it is inexact. I think the longitude system should be used in South to
North dimensions and not only for East to West dimensions.

> Community Server Space
> 
> Based on the backbones today in Latin America, what are the best
> points for such servers? How i see, the best connections are based on
> the coastlines or parallel to that. And the interconnection from west
> to east and reverse?
> 
> Based on the sea cable map i see two centers in brasil, north and
> south. And this routes are also connected to the caribbean. And from
> Fortaleza goes a line to Spain. But i have no map with all backbones
> and IXPs in Latin America.
> 
> Yes, i know, this data are very "clandestine". High security. The
> state don't like, that the people know, what shit they do.

Servers should be in each persons home or office. Nevertheless, maybe
some people cannot afford them yet. In the meantime, their friends can
host their accounts. That is why we need federation. I like Freedombone
with Parabola. Maybe GuixSD will port Freedombone too.

> Global network for free technology
> 
> "with federated servers"? What is that? You mean combined, connected? 
> Based on the existing backbones? Yes, in this time it will be
> necessary. Until we find our way to design, construct and fabricate
> our own components there, where we need it.

Federated servers means servers that have several users that share as if
they were one server maintaining certain constrainst the users
define.

> Maybe, this is our biggest problem to create the technical 
> infrastructures that we can do it local/regional.

This is the domain name space. Perhaps we should disregard it totally
because it is possible to connect as is done with Tor. Then no one can
have exclusivity on a name.

> Time of the people, the most important ressource, exist enough. Also
> the financial ressource in the short time view exist enough, if we
> reduce the big parasitic apparatus from military, paramilitary and
> buerocratic system.
> 
> Its more a philosophical problem.

Very true.

> In april i will go back to Europe and there also to Nord Spain:
> Guifi, cooperative Mondragon and technical university in Barcelona.
> From Germany i will try to get the connection to Syria and Persia.
> What i see now, they have the same problems. Always import technical
> systems or act with venture capitalistic structures like Brasil.
> 
> But maybe, they go more strong in direction to independence.
> Sometimes i think, the Latin Americans hate or fear the independence.
> They like to be slaves from North America and Europe?

I think it is a lack of knowledge and self esteem. If you lack
undestanding of nature you think that your master is your god and that
you cannot do anything about it. Perhaps if we understand that it is
possible to get freedom and the advantages, we will strive for it.

> "Is axixes the plural of axis"? No, axes. English logic.

Yes! I remember now. Thank you.

-- 
Saluton,
Quiliro


Más información sobre la lista de distribución Discusion