The positive approach to FLISOL

Santiago Roza santiagoroza en
Mie Ene 30 18:34:19 UTC 2008

dos ejemplos de cualquier verdura que la osi aprobo como open source,
pero la fsf dice que no son libres (y sus razones):

 NASA Open Source Agreement
    The NASA Open Source Agreement, version 1.3, is not a free
software license because it includes a provision requiring changes to
be your "original creation". Free software development depends on
combining code from third parties, and the NASA license doesn't permit

 Reciprocal Public License
    The Reciprocal Public License is a non-free license because of
three problems. 1. It puts limits on prices charged for an initial
copy. 2. It requires notification of the original developer for
publication of a modified version. 3. It requires publication of any
modified version that an organization uses, even privately.

Santiago Roza
santiagoroza at

Más información sobre la lista de distribución Discusion