ISO JTC1 ballot N-8812

Mrc Gran mrc.gran en gmail.com
Dom Dic 9 12:17:03 UTC 2007


Norbert Bollow enviou um email interessante sobre uma tentativa,
na forma de uma votaçao para estabelecer um "grupo ad-hoc de
participacao direta", que permitiria que corporaçoes diretamente
influenciem o resultado das votaçoes da ISO.
Alguem tem o texto do N-8812?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Norbert Bollow <nb em bollow.ch>
Date: Dec 8, 2007 9:33 PM
Subject: [OpenISO] ISO/IEC JTC1 Ballot N-8812
To: discuss em openiso.org


Those of you who are also members of your national standardization
organization's mirror committee for ISO/IEC JTC1 may be aware of
the letter ballot N-8812 about the Establishment of an "Ad Hoc Group
on Direct Participation".

I intend to vote "no" with a comment like the following, and
encourage others to do the same.  (In other countries at least
the explicit references to Switzerland should be changed of
course.)

"""
Swiss stakeholder organizations as well as individuals are already
able today to participate in the work of ISO/IEC JTC1 if they are
interested and have the comptence for doing so, simply by becoming
members of the Swiss Association for Standardization and informing
about what working group activities their experts are willing and
able to contribute to.  Of course, this situation is not unique to
Switzerland.  Rather, the P-member bodies of any ISO committee have
a duty to identify experts who can contribute to the related working
group activities.

Therefore, the proposal to change the rules of JTC1 to introduce
"direct participation" is not really about empowering the
participation of stakeholders who would otherwise be somehow unable
to do so.  Rather, the main effect of the proposal would be to
further increase the influence of those corporations which try to
get what is essentially technical documentation of their products
approved as "international standards".  These companies could then
participate directly in addition to also influencing the national
member bodies.  This would certainly increase their interest in
JTC1, but not in ways that are beneficial to the public interest.

As Martin Bryan, Convenor of JTC1/SC34 WG1 has warned [1],
"The disparity of rules for PAS, Fast-Track and ISO committee
generated standards is fast making ISO a laughing stock in IT
circles. The days of open standards development are fast
disappearing. Instead we are getting 'standardization by
corporation'..."

It is therefore important to avoid exploring changes that would
move JTC1 in the wrong direction and which would divert attention
from those changes which are urgently needed to encourage the
development of genuinely open standards and to decrease the risk
of the adoption as international standards of specifications which
are "open standards" only in name.


[1] http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0940.htm
"""

Greetings,
Norbert.


--
Norbert Bollow <nb em bollow.ch>                      http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG    http://SIUG.ch
Working on establishing a non-corrupt and
truly /open/ international standards organization  http://OpenISO.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss em openiso.org
http://openiso.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: http://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/stdlib/attachments/20071209/35253f65/attachment.html


Más información sobre la lista de distribución Stdlib