PCMCIA .cis files
    Alexandre Oliva 
    lxoliva at fsfla.org
       
    Sat Jan  1 13:39:29 UTC 2011
    
    
  
On Dec 31, 2010, Richard Stallman <rms at gnu.org> wrote:
>     I'm not sure the .cis files are software.  They are binary descriptions
>     of the card name, function, compatibility and hardware configuration.
> I am not sure the question matters.  Does it?  The only significant
> difference between the binary form and the textual form is the
> comment, but if that comment is useful, then the textual form is
> better.
I wouldn't say the comment is useful, but I think the textual form is
better anyway.
> So if you want to add these files, where's the problem?  Add the source.
I don't want to clutter the deblob scripts adding lots of stuff.
> But the first question is, is there a reason to add them?
> Why do you want to add them?
I don't.  I'd just like to keep the binary .cis files if there wasn't
any reason to remove them.
>     Linux-libre has long removed all .cis files that are requested by the
>     various PCMCIA drivers.
> What do these files DO?  What job are they used for?
The PCMCIA driver gets from this file data on PCMCIA standards
compatibility, voltage, I/O ports and IRQs it's supposed to use to talk
to the device, in addition to name and type of card.
-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
    
    
More information about the linux-libre
mailing list