Linux Libre in Debian

[Jason Self]

On Tue, 2025-12-09 at 09:33 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> So even if the deblob scripts will disappear, running a diff between
> the linux-libre tarball that you publish and the upstream linux
> kernel code, then applying that patch during build, will result in
> the same input source for the build process.  So I think this
> approach of doing a "delta" package can continue to work even if the
> deblob scripts would disappear.

Except not so much:

On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 04:51 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> ...but publishing such scripts is probably not going to work,
> freedom-wise.

We currently have diffs that don't get published because the diffs
contain the problematic stuff being deleted. Sharing them means also
sharing that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 870 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/attachments/20251209/f5bf5aa0/attachment.sig>