on disabling drivers that use non-Free firmware
rmh at aybabtu.com
Tue Jan 6 00:52:24 UTC 2009
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:01:50PM -0500, Richard M Stallman wrote:
> be pushing it a bit to defend it by claiming that they might be used in
> 100% Free settings.
> But that is not the issue here. The issue is about drivers which,
> for certain hardware, will not work at all without the loading of
> non-free firmware.
> If we include those drivers unmodified in our version of Linux, users
> will try them, and when they use the devices that require non-free
> firmware, they will ask "how do I make this work". And someone will
> tell them "here's the file you need", meaning the blob, and they will
> "fix it" by installing the blob.
> We should change these drivers to make report clearly "This device is
> not supported" instead of trying to load the blob.
Somewhat related to this: I've been toying with the idea of writing a
desktop session daemon, technically similar to Ubuntu's "restricted-manager",
but with a different purpose: detect devices that require non-free firmware
(based on bus id heuristics), and display a message explaining the user why
these aren't supported, and discouraging him/her from buying hardware from
Maybe I get to it when I find some free time.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
More information about the linux-libre